Penetration tests are often treated like a gold standard.
They’re expensive. Formal. Signed off by boards.

But here’s the truth:

🛑 A pen test is only a snapshot — and that snapshot is often obsolete before the ink is dry.

Let us explain — with a story from the field.


Real Story: The Pen Test That Missed Everything

A client recently asked to benchmark Cyber Tzar against the results of their recent penetration test — completed just four weeks earlier.

They wanted proof we could offer more value.
We were happy to provide it.

📊 Within minutes of running our scans, we uncovered dozens of critical vulnerabilities that the pen test had missed.

Why?

Because in the time since the pen test:

  • A developer had pushed a new code release to production

  • The change introduced new exposures — entirely untested

  • No new scanning or security review had been done since

💥 The pen test, despite being “just done”, was already out of date.


Pen Tests Are Still Useful — But Not Enough

Let’s be clear — we’re not anti-pen test.

🛠 Pen tests are valuable for deep, manual probing.

But they should not be your only line of defence.

Here’s why:

  • Pen tests are point-in-time — but threats are continuous

  • They rarely integrate with CI/CD or DevSecOps workflows

  • Many are checklist-driven and fail to simulate real-world change

  • New exploits emerge daily — a clean pen test isn’t a lasting guarantee

Relying solely on annual testing is like checking a bridge for cracks once a year — even when lorries are passing over it daily.


Why “Shift Left” Matters

The above incident highlights more than a scanning gap — it shows a cultural gap.

⚙️ Security must shift left — meaning:

  • Test during development

  • Scan every code push

  • Monitor infrastructure changes continuously

  • Catch vulnerabilities before they hit production

Cyber Tzar was built with this principle in mind.


What Cyber Tzar Adds That Pen Tests Don’t

Always-On Scanning
We continuously monitor web-facing assets — not once a year, but every day.

Live Threat Intelligence Matching
Every vulnerability is scored against known active threats — if it’s being exploited now, we flag it immediately.

Business Impact Prioritisation
Not every issue matters equally. We rank issues by their real-world risk to your organisation — not theoretical severity.

DevSecOps-Friendly
Our platform supports shift-left workflows, providing visibility from test environments to live production.


Boards Need More Than a Badge

Pen test reports can give the illusion of safety.

But attackers don’t care about reports.
They care about open doors — and they check daily.

Boards should ask:

  • What has changed since our last pen test?

  • What are we doing to catch new issues introduced today?

  • Are we scanning our infrastructure as frequently as we update it?

If there’s no answer — the risk is growing, silently.


Final Word

A pen test might show you what was safe last month.
Cyber Tzar shows you what’s at risk right now.

💡 Use pen tests for assurance.
⚠️ But use continuous scanning for defence.


📡 Want to see what your pen test missed?
🧪 Run a side-by-side scan with Cyber Tzar at cybertzar.com

View more resources

View more resources